Replace the Trivial, Augment the Difficult
A rule in the code-review engine I built caught an idiom I've been writing for years and can no longer see. That's the small half.
A rule in the code-review engine I built caught an idiom I've been writing for years and can no longer see. That's the small half.
A change lands in review with everything green. The rules pass, the types check, the tests are close to the ones I'd have asked for.
One evening an agent working in this repo killed an idea of mine for failing a rule. The kill was well argued and it cited the rule by line number, the way…
A newer engineer left a note on my pull request: this array should be readonly. He was right.
The reflex, when a model meets something long, is to make it shorter. Summarise the PR, TL;DR the paper, have the agent review the diff and hand back the…
Read that definition again. It's one of the most widely-cited code-review standards telling reviewers how to flag a small issue: say the author should fix it…
I was building a code-review tool. Nothing fancy — read the diff, flag what's wrong, the job I do by hand a dozen times a week.
A while back, I stopped reading the AI's end-of-task summaries and started watching the diffs. They came through faster than I could have typed them.
Linus Torvalds vibe-coded the visualizer and hand-wrote the audio math. One repository, the whole argument — writing code was never the scarce skill.